Welcome to your local community website...

County council says BRAINS wrong over incinerator costs

Posted by Polly Manser on Apr 29, 09 09:53 PM in

Buckinghamshire County Council has responded to claims by anti incinerator campaigners that the cost of incinerating rubbish will soar.
Bucks Residents Against Incinerators (BRAINS) claimed last week that the disposal of bottom ash from incinerators is now more expensive because more of it is classed as hazardous.


But Martin Dickman, BCC's waste service manager said this week: "Since the incidence of hazardous substances in the material is so low, the impact on our costs will be equally low because only a minimum is likely to be landfilled as hazardous. Most bottom ash is reprocessed as aggregate and sold on to the construction industry, which could work in our favour financially, depending on the final contract terms."
The Advertiser is happy to clarify that BCC has not made a final decision over whether an incinerator is to be built, that a location has not been confirmed and that no contract has been awarded. A BCC spokesman said one of two preferred bidders is likely to be selected on July 13. Veolia is not a preferred bidder.
An Environment Agency spokesman explained zinc oxide has been reclassified as ecotoxic, so if bottom ash contains zinc oxide, it is now hazardous. It has been added to a list of other substances that render bottom ash hazardous.
If bottom ash is not hazardous it can be sold as an aggregate. If it is hazardous it must be disposed of at a specialist site.
Fees to dispose of hazardous waste are higher. In addition taxes rise from from £2.50 per tonne for material HM Revenue and Customs considers inert to £40 per tonne for material it considers hazardous. Most bottom ash is non-hazardous, he said.


We'd like to hear from you.
Send your
stories, pics and videos

4 Comments

Resident of Beaconsfield said:

The sooner they get on with building this incinerator, the better as far as I am concerned. It will give certain residents who have nothing better to do with their lives other than whinge and whine, an excuse to getting back to work and getting an aforementioned life!! Honestly, all this fuss over a glorified bonfire.....anyone would think that they were building a Nuclear plant....

The incinerator in Kent has been broke for most of 2008. The council has saved £2.2million due to the breakdown and another £2m due to there being less waste than expected. The PFI incinerators are so cost and have contracts that lead to councils reducing recycling efforts.

motco said:

"Most bottom ash is non-hazardous, he (BCC representative) said."

As the famous Mandy Rice-Davies once replied; "Well, they would say that, wouldn't they?"

Is BCC going to analyse the bottom ash constantly to separate out the toxic from the merely offensive? No, of course not!

Cynical B'stard said:

Hopefully it will all blow downwind towards High Wycombe....it's not like anyone will miss it's inhabitants now, is it?

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Get involved

Our website aims to cover anything and everything happening in your community from news to local amateur sport and clubs to events. As users of the community we want you to set the agenda by telling us about the things that affect you, the groups and societies you run and the events you've been a part of. Send us your stories, pictures and news or join the forum to discuss local issues with your neighbours. If you've got something to say and want to be involved contact Polly Manser or call 01895 451000.

Sponsored Links